Close [x]
By using the site you express your consent to the use of cookie files, some of which may be already saved in the browser folder.
For more information, please follow the Privacy and using cookie files policy for the service

Office of Competition and Consumer Protection

Increase font sizeDecrease font sizeHigh-contrast versionText versionText versionRSS ChannelGet QR codeWersja polska

You're here: Home > About us > About us > News

Telekomunikacja Stacjonarna (Landline Telecommunications) fined with over 320 thousand

< previous | next > 23.07.2020

Telekomunikacja Stacjonarna (Landline Telecommunications) fined with over 320 thousand
  • Representatives of Telekomunikacja Stacjonarna misled consumers and did not provide them with complete contracts.
  • The company illegally collected activation and compensation fees.
  • President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection Tomasz Chróstny imposed a fine on Telekomunikacja Stacjonarna in the amount of over PLN 320 thousand for practices that violate collective consumer interests.

Telekomunikacja Stacjonarna (currently in liquidation) was fined by the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection for the second time in 7 months. The first time in December 2019 for the use of abusive clauses and the second time in July 2020 for infringing the consumers' collective interests.

“We have been receiving a lot of complaints on Telekomunikacja Stacjonarna, which in its practices was primarily targeting seniors. It is unethical and unacceptable to win new customers by fraudulent methods - by impersonating an existing operator whom customers have already trusted. We also objected to the illegal charging of certain fees,” says Tomasz Chróstny, the President of UOKiK.

Violation of consumers’ rights

As a general rule, the agents representing the Telekomunikacja Stacjonarna would present their offer by phone and then send a courier to the customer with a contract to be signed. The company's representatives suggested to consumers that they would be offered more favourable terms and conditions of the contract with the existing operator, instead of concluding a new contract with another company. I signed a contract with this company because the agent introduced himself to work for ORANGE - of which I am the customer - and offered me better terms and conditions. I asked if it was ORANGE and showed my bills and this gentleman confirmed – one of the consumers wrote. Another victim reported: I am an elderly person, I am 85 years old, I have sight and hearing impairment, so I make all important decisions after consulting my children. The story was presented to me so that I was convinced it was Orange.

Telekomunikacja Stacjonarna in its offer was primarily targeting seniors. The average age of customers calculated based on more than one thousand concluded contracts is 71.5 years. Apart from misleading them as to the name of the company and the purpose of signing a contract, couriers often did not provide them with signed documents or handed out incomplete documents, e.g. without the first page of the name of the company or without a contract termination template. As a result, many consumers only found out about the change of operator when they received a bill to be paid from an unknown company. Without documents, they were not able to verify the terms of the contract or the price list.

President of UOKiK Tomasz Chróstny also questioned Telekomunikacja Stacjonarna's charging of an activation fee (upon signing - PLN 14.76) and a compensation fee (upon termination of the contract - PLN 25 for each month remaining) while the company had not started providing subscription services. This is against the Telecommunications Law. Telekomunikacja Stacjonarna illegally charged these fees also to individuals who used its services only through an access number, but they had not changed their operator in terms of subscription. By contrast, the purpose of the model of selection of a telephone service provider by access number or pre-selection was to enable consumers to benefit from competitive offers from operators, before each call is made. They can have access numbers of even a dozen or so telecommunications companies and each time they choose an offer that is best at a given moment. Charging additional fees for such contracts would discourage consumers from concluding them with more service providers.

The President of UOKiK ordered Telekomunikacja Stacjonarna to immediately discontinue unfair practices. The company was also fined for the amount of PLN 326.4 thousand. The decision is not yet final.

Abusive clauses

This is not the first fine imposed on Telekomunikacja Stacjonarna. In December 2019 the President of UOKiK asserted that the company applied prohibited contractual provisions. These included, inter alia, automatic extension of contracts for 2 years or granting irrevocable powers of attorney for transferring the number (see the Decision for details). The fine then imposed amounted to PLN 56 thousand. The decision is not final. The company appealed to the court.

Consumer support:

Phone: +48 801 440 220 or +48 22 290 89 16 – consumer helpline
e-mail: [SCODE]cG9yYWR5QGRsYWtvbnN1bWVudG93LnBs[ECODE]
Consumer ombudsmen – in your town or district
Regional Consumer Centres: Phone: +48 22 299 60 90 – Dlakonsumenta.pl
Office of Electronic Communications - Consumer Information Centre – 22 330 40 00

Additional information for the media:

UOKiK Press Office
Pl. Powstańców Warszawy 1, 00-950 Warszawa, Poland
Phone +48 695 902 088, +48 22 55 60 246
E-mail: [SCODE]Yml1cm9wcmFzb3dlQHVva2lrLmdvdi5wbA==[ECODE]
Twitter: @UOKiKgovPL

Attached files

 

Read also

Have you suffered a loss due to anti-competitive practices? You may claim compensation
Have you suffered a loss due to anti-competitive practices? You may claim compensation

Individuals injured by anti-competitive practices may seek redress in the courts. President of UOKiK Tomasz Chróstny reminds that it is of no relevance to the case whether the decision on legal infringement was issued by the European Commission and the seat of the company infringing the law is located in other EU countries is irrelevant. ...>

Bid rigging - decision of the President of UOKiK
Bid rigging - decision of the President of UOKiK

President of UOKiK Tomasz Chróstny has issued his decision in a bid rigging case. The companies transporting the pupils were illegally influencing the results of public procurements - if their proposals were the most advantageous, then the winner gave up the contract, so that the second, higher-priced offer of the collusive entity would be selected. ...>

Nord Stream 2 - President of UOKiK imposes penalty on Gazprom
Nord Stream 2 - President of UOKiK imposes penalty on Gazprom

President of UOKiK Tomasz Chróstny has imposed a penalty of PLN almost 213 mln on Gazprom for failure to cooperate in the investigation conducted in relation to the construction of Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline. ...>

The President of UOKiK imposed a fine of PLN 115 million on Biedronka
The President of UOKiK imposed a fine of PLN 115 million on Biedronka

Price at the checkout higher than the one displayed on the shelf or no information about the product price - this is how Biedronka has been violating consumers' rights for several years. President of UOKiK Tomasz Chróstny imposed a fine of PLN 115 million on the owner of the Biedronka retail chain, Jeronimo Martins Polska. ...>

Credit holidays - summary of actions taken by UOKiK
Credit holidays - summary of actions taken by UOKiK

As a result of actions taken by the Office, consumers are receiving clear and accurate information regarding the cost of a non-legislative moratorium, the so-called commercial credit holidays, and the ability to opt out of such a solution.  ...>

The investment control regulations enter into force
The investment control regulations enter into force

On 24th July, new investment control regulations came into force. The President of UOKiK is able to protect Polish companies that are of critical importance to order, security or public health. The UOKiK has published a document that guides potential investors on how they should report a transaction. ...>

Top